![]() 12 meeting behind closed doors-an official executive session-will focus on legal matters that have arisen. The board is now is discussing the matter amongst itself, publicly, but with input and questions from the public at meetings like this and the recent Sept. The Board has received a report from an Advisory Committee appointed by a former town administrator, plus an overwhelming amount of correspondence from the public. “We acknowledge the long-term implications that flow from here,” he said. 19, according to Board Chair Paul Joseph (a decision Joseph admitted could anger half of the town). But the Select Board could make a decision on removal vs. He’s come to support removal based on a number of factors, including reduced liability for the town, environmental benefits, and honoring the indigenous community with ties to the river and land, while also providing an opportunity to reimagine the area.Įxactly what becomes of the dam and spillway (aka, waterfall) might not be known for months or years to come. Turner called the process that has since taken place very meaningful given all the information gather and public feedback welcomed. It seemed to me that we had a very big decision ahead of us and it made sense to consider all the different possibilities before making a commitment.” I didn’t ask that question with kind of a clear sense in my mind of what the town should do. “I was the person in the context of that meeting that did broach the possibility of whether the town had considered removing the dam. “At that meeting, I-and I think many people there-were really concerned about what seemed to be a big project that was moving forward at a rapid rate which really hadn’t been discussed much publicly at that point,” he said. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |